PCR misdiagnoses used by Fauci to Commit Genocide of healthy people!

Nobel Prize winner and creator of the the PCR test Kary Mullis DEBUNKS PCR as valid test for viruses

Background

The common perception that has been peddled for years is that PCR is a valid mechanism for testing for viruses. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is the initial test conducted, mostly in the Gay and African communities to determine if a person is at risk of acquiring Acquired ImmunoDeficiency SYNDROME or AIDS.

To understand this fully, you need to first grasp that AIDS is NOT a VIRUS, it is a SYNDROME of which HIV is one of the characteristics.

What is a Syndrome?

A syndrome is defined as (in Merriam-Webster) as:

: a group of signs and symptoms that occur together and characterize a particular abnormality or condition

In the case of AIDS, a number of signs or symptoms must be met in order to declare the patient as AIDS positive.

So, What is AIDS?

AIDS or Acquired ImmunoDeficiency SYNDROME is a group of signs or symptoms. These differ dependent on if they are diagnosed in a “resource limited” setting or a “normal” setting.

1. The “normal” setting classification
   This is the official CDC Classification (United States) – 1993 (Still Used Today):

   1. Have HIV infection, and

   2. Meet at least one of the following criteria:

      1. CD4+ count below 200 cells/mm³

      2. One or more of the listed illnesses:

         1. Thrush,

         2. Fungal Infection (Cryptococcosis),

         3. Histoplasmosis,

         4. Coccidioidomycosis,

         5. TB,

         6. Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC),

         7. pneumonia,

         8. Salmonella of the blood (recurrent),

         9. CMV disease,

         10. Herpes (HSV),

         11. PML (brain infection),

         12. Toxoplasmosis,

         13. Cryptosporidiosis,

         14. Isosporiasis,

         15. Kaposi's sarcoma,

         16. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma,

         17. Primary CNS lymphoma,

         18. Systemic lymphoma,

         19. Invasive cervical cancer,

         20. Chronic Weight Loss, Diarrhea, weakness and fever,

         21. HIV Encephalopathy

         THESE CAN HAPPEN WITH OR WITHOUT HIV

2. In a LIMITED RESOURCE setting

   This is the WHO Clinical Staging of HIV/AIDS

   1. Stage 1: Asymptomatic HIV infection

   2. Stage 2: Mild symptoms, minor infections

   3. Stage 3: Advanced symptoms, weight loss, chronic infections

   4. Stage 4 (AIDS): Severe immune suppression, with opportunistic infections, cancers, and wasting syndrome
      

The key to this illusion is covered in classification “a” above of both settings. i.e. to “have HIV infection” or “an asymptomatic HIV infection”.

Please remember the word “asymptomatic” used for “limited resource” settings, such as many African Nations for example, where it was totally acceptable to declare a patient as a stage 1 AIDS patient purely on an ASYMPTOMATIC HIV DIAGNOSES.

To break the illusion you need to investigate HOW the medical establishment determines if someone if HIV positive.

PCR Test; the test that that can find ANYTHING in ANYONE

The answer lies in the PCR test. A test that was made possible by the creator of this test methodology, the late 1993 Nobel Prize winner, Kary B Mullis (who conveniently died immediately before the plandemic on 7 Aug 2019, at the age of 74) .

He is quoted as stating:

“… if done propoerly, [the PCR test] can be used to find ANYTHING in ANYONE”

— Kary B Mullis (1944-2019), Inventor of PCR and 1993 Nobel Prize winner

WATCH On RUMBLE

The main takeaway from the video is that the PCR can find ANYTHING in ANYONE and should NOT BE USED as the primary diagnostic mechanism for HIV, SARS-CoV2 or ANYTHING!

To further this illusion, you should realise that (just like in the case of COVID) people who were otherwise healthy could have been declared HIV positive just through a FAULTY, DECEPTIVE PCR result, and be called “asymptomatic”!

AZT POISON to the rescue

So now you have a heap of Gays and Africans being WRONGLY declared as asymtomatic HIV carriers via a test that can find ANYTHING in ANYONE and being advised to take a POISONOUS anti-cancer medication AZT that had been abandoned 20 years prior in 1967, due to it’s overwhelming toxicity. A fact that has been all but hidden from the modern journals.

WATCH ON RUMBLE

Summary - TLDR

So this is the short version. Africans and Homosexuals were targeted with a faulty testing methodology (PCR) that would falsely identify them with a virus (HIV) that has not even been proven to spread through sexual contact.

A fear campaign was pushed to make the illusion complete (just like with COVID).

Otherwise healthy individuals were given TOXIC medication to “manage” their (non-existent) “asymptomatic” HIV infections. This caused them to deteriorate (due to it’s TOXICITY as stated by the founder of AZT who abandoned it’s use YEARS before stating that it was too toxic for human consumption).

So given this finding, Fauci and his team decided, that AZT would be the POISON they would use to genocide a heap of GAYS and BLACKS and cause the general populace to be scared of having sex without contraception (population control anyone??)

Eventually, the POISON they were given would trigger the other conditions required to call the condition “AIDS” which is a syndrome and not a virus.

Therefore the people were said to have died of AIDS when they hadn’t as AIDS requires HIV infection which was likely not even present when they died! They died of poisoning!

ANY QUESTIONS??

HIV Not an STD?

Further to all this, an extract from the book Virus Mania - How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics (2007) by authors: Torsten Engelbrecht, Claus Kohnlein states that there is no proof that HIV can even be transmitted sexually!

AIDS Is Not a Sexually-Transmitted Disease

And so, the simple and yet "politically incorrect truth is rarely spoken out loud : the dreaded heterosexual epidemic never happened," Kevin Gray, of the US magazine Details reported to his readers' in early 2004. The "degree of epidemic" in the population of developed nations has remained practically unchanged. In the USA, for example, since 1985, the number of those termed HIV-infected has remained stable at one million people (which corresponds to a fraction of one percent of the population) . But if HIV were actually a new sexually transmitted virus, there should have been an exponential rise (and fall) in case numbers. Additionally, in wealthy countries like the USA and Germany according to official statistics, poppers-consuming homosexuals have always made up around 50% of all AIDS patients, and intravenous drug users about 30% - a further seven percent are both.

With this, almost all AIDS patients are men who lead a self-destructive lifestyle with toxic drugs, medications, etc. In contrast, the official statistics say that in poor countries:

- a much larger proportion of the population has AIDS

- men and women are equally affected and

- primarily, malnourished people suffer from AIDS.

This clearly shows that AIDS symptoms are triggered by environmental factors like drugs, medications and insufficient nutrition. And it clearly speaks against the presumption that a virus is at work here "that moves like a phenomenon of globalization - just like data streams, financial rivers, migration waves, jet planes, fast, borderless, and incalculable," as the German weekly newspaper Die Zeit urgently warned on its front page in 2004.

Such a pathogen would inevitably have to attack all people in all countries of the world equally: men and women, straight and gay, African and German and not, as statistics reveal, in a racial and gender-biased way, attacking certain populations at different rates. In this context, Details writer Gray mentions a joke which made the rounds in the New York City Department of Health when the accumulation of AIDS statistics began: "What do you call a man who [says he] got AIDS from his girlfriend? A liar!" In fact, the largest and best-conceived studies on the subject of sex and AIDS show that AIDS is not a sexually transmitted disease. The fact is glaringly obvious in the most comprehensive paper on this topic: Nancy Padian's 1997 study on seroconversion rates among couples, published in the American Journal of Epidemiology with an observation period of ten years ( 1985 - 1995).

In it, not a single case could be uncovered in which an HIV negative partner eventually became "positive" (or "seroconverted") through sexual contact with his or her HIV positive partner. That is to say, the observed transmission rate was zero.

VIRUS MANIA is an EXCELLENT reference that outlines much of what happened during this period can be read and downloaded here:

Download/read Virus Mania

ART to the rescue

Having been all but found out regarding the AZT scam, this information was quickly buried and confused by foul paid off medical journals and scientists and the switch was made to Anti Retroviral Treatment (ART). This is broad spectrum of drugs that we are told keep the viral load of the (potentially abscent) virus in an “undetectable” state (which shouldn’t be hard if it isn’t there in the first place)!

Speculation of the STATUS QUO

The most effected areas of the world were Ground Zero (San Francisco) and of course Africa who still to this day is suffering under an ILLUSION and most likely being fed medications that fall under the banner of Anti Retroviral Treatment (ART) which is some cases can make them less fertile.

Effects of ART on fertility

Male Fertility

• Sperm Quality: Some ART drugs (e.g., protease inhibitors) may lower sperm count, motility, or morphology, but this effect is usually mild and reversible.

• Mitochondrial Damage: Some ART drugs may affect sperm mitochondria, leading to reduced sperm function, but newer ART regimens have fewer effects.

Female Fertility

• Menstrual Cycle Changes: Some women on ART may experience irregular periods

• Ovarian Reserve: Some studies suggest ART may slightly reduce ovarian reserve (egg count)

• Birth Defects & Pregnancy Risks: Most ART drugs are safe for pregnancy, but some (e.g., efavirenz in early pregnancy) may have risks.

In Summary

Who would change the treatment from the poisonous AZT to ART that has the following potential effects on fertility?

Who would give someone a toxic medication that was abandoned years before by it's creator due to toxicity? Perhaps someone trying reduce population?

And who would present a virus in a way that implicated homosexuals as the cause? Or Africans as the cause? A bunch of fascist bigots who want to reduce population!

ENTER THE ILLUMINATI and ASSOCIATED SECRET SOCIETIES.

The Puppet Masters. The Illusionists. THE DECEIVERS!

This pattern of FAKE virus, accompanied with hysteria,faulty diagnoses tool (PCR) and a poisonous treatment was mirrored during the COVID pandemic when otherwise healthy people were being admitted to hospitals and dying not of COVID but of IATROGENIC causes!

See the pattern!? Now you can’t UNSEE it!

---